Connect with us

Good News

A plan to revive imperial measurements in the UK divides the nation

Published

on

Barman serving beer in a pub
Certain measurements in Britain still use the imperial system, including sale of beer and milk, measured in pints

People in the UK are, once again divided. And this time it is not about Brexit, the Royal family, nor political parties trying to undermine each other.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson is expected to make an announcement on Friday, June 3, to coincide with the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee, about moving away from the current metric system.

And although the British government is understood to be preparing to open a consultation into how to further incorporate imperial measurements, after the controversial Brexit – with No 10 hoping for support even in Leave-voting areas – internet users have been, somewhat, less kind with the matter.

British political activist Femi Oluwole was fast to share his views on Twitter:

“Tories: “If we change food measurements to the imperial system and change our currency back to Shillings and Pence, people won’t be able to tell how much poorer we’ve made them through Austerity and Brexit! GENIUS!” – posted the co-founder of the pro-European Union advocacy group Our Future Our Choice.

“The government is switching to imperial measurements, this is like fixing a spelling mistake on the Titanic’s menu after it struck the iceberg while they’re setting fire to all the lifeboats. “ – says London-based chef Dave Ahern.

“Politicians still don’t understand that every regulatory change brings with it a cost, certainly true of the imperial measures, but can also be true of ‘deregulatory’ measures or even the uncertainty that they may change.” – warns David Henig, UK director of the European Centre For International Political Economy.

Johnson first hinted about bringing the imperial system back in the 2019 general election campaign, when he described it as an “ancient liberty”. However, not many countries in the world still use imperial measures anymore in the 21st century and, if re-introduced in the UK, it won’t make people change their habits in a hurry.

“I’m not the great imperial/metric expert but for me as a customer, using the example of milk, being able to buy a pint of milk helps me, and definitely my elderly relatives/friends who can’t fathom metric. Smaller stores I would imagine finding imperial easier for customers.” – defends musician Nick Wilson from Wicklow, Ireland.

 

“So the UK Government wants to bring back imperial measurements? I know Metric better than imperial and don’t wanna be the old guy who says “oh back when ” was your age I used metric” drove me mad in retail” – protested freelancer web developer Glenn Marshall

 

For clinical epidemiologist and statistical geneticist Deepti Gurdasani, the plan to revive imperial measurements in UK is a political tact:

“Imperial measurement headlines are just a distraction from the fact that we have a PM who has literally changed the rules to make it impossible to be held to account after breaking the law & lying. His power holds no bounds while his party enables him. That is the real story.” – shared Gurdasani, a senior lecturer in machine learning at the Queen Mary University of London.

 

The British Imperial System was used officially in Great Britain from 1824 until the adoption of the metric system beginning in 1965. But it wasn’t until 2000 that traders have been legally required to use metric units like milligrams, grams and kilograms for sale by weight or measure of fresh produce. Certain measurements in Britain still use the imperial system, including sale of beer and milk, measured in pints, and speed limit, which in the UK is measured in miles per hour rather than kilometers.

 

Marcio Delgado is a Journalist, Producer and Influencer Marketing Manager working with brands and publications in Europe, America and Asia.

Good News

Royal Society honours Northumbria team for reshaping STEM engagement

Published

on

Royal Society honours Northumbria team for reshaping STEM engagement
Mel Horan, Primary Outreach Officer with NUSTEM at Northumbria University.

Northumbria University’s NUSTEM outreach team has been recognised by the Royal Society for work that has quietly reshaped how young people encounter science across the UK. Over the past decade, the group has built long‑term partnerships with schools, families and national organisations, creating evidence‑based resources that help children understand STEM careers and see themselves as potential scientists and engineers. Their approach blends hands‑on engagement with rigorous research — a combination that has now earned them the Royal Society Athena Prize 2026, one of the UK’s most respected honours for advancing diversity in STEM.

A decade of impact across schools and communities

NUSTEM, led by Professor Carol Davenport, has been awarded the Royal Society Athena Prize 2026 for its work promoting equity in STEM and strengthening the research evidence base around effective STEM education and engagement. The prize, awarded every two years, recognises teams that advance diversity in science, technology, engineering and mathematics within their communities.

Since 2014, NUSTEM has partnered with 48 primary schools and 20 secondary schools across the North East, plus a wider network across the UK. The team has recorded more than 150,000 interactions with children and young people, and nearly 33,000 with teachers, parents, carers and the broader STEM community. Their work ranges from family STEM activities to classroom resources that help children develop a ‘science identity’ and understand the breadth of STEM careers.

Setting a national benchmark for inclusive STEM engagement

NUSTEM also supports companies and STEM organisations in developing outreach programmes, including through its attributes‑led approach to career‑related learning — now used by groups such as the British Science Association and the Science and Technology Facilities Council’s Public Engagement teams.

Professor Carol Davenport said: “The NUSTEM team is delighted to have our long-term work to support diversity in STEM recognised by the Royal Society. Our approach has always been to meld high-quality engagement practice with excellent research in the field of STEM engagement.”

The award follows NUSTEM’s 2025 William Thomson, Lord Kelvin Medal and Prize for public engagement in physics. Professor Andy Shepherd, Interim Pro Vice-Chancellor for the Faculty of Science and Environment, said the Royal Society’s recognition “sets a benchmark for the sector.”

Continue Reading

Good News

Great Northern joins Stevenage FC players to support town’s homeless

Published

on

Great Northern joins Stevenage FC players to support town’s homeless
Great Northern staff are collecting anything with a decent shelf life, such as tinned food, coffee and tea. | Photo: Peter Alvey/ GN

To address the cost of living crisis and mark the 13th anniversary of their partnership with Stevenage Football Club Academy, Great Northern’s railway station staff are calling on town commuters to help them support a town-based charity for homeless people.

All week from 8am-11am up to and including this Thursday (27 August) the station staff are collecting food donated by passengers for a homeless drop-in centre for people in need that is run out of Stevenage FC football stadium.

Every Monday, from 5-7pm, charity Feed Up, Warm Up provides a hot meal and a hot drink for up to 120 people in need and others suffering from the cost of living crisis, many of them homeless, from the centre they set up in the Sporta Stadium, Stevenage. The academy players help at the drop-in centre, learning valuable skills.

“For 13 years now, we’ve been supporting 16-18-year-old Stevenage FC Academy players by giving them free train travel to and from their practice games and study. We think it’s a great scheme and one we really want to support.

“This year, to develop that partnership still further, we decided to join the club in supporting this hugely worthwhile charity. There’s a real cost of living crisis going on and anything we and can do with our customers at the station has to be a good thing,” Great Northern’s CSR Manager Tracy Jarvis said.

Not everyone is homeless – many simply struggle to make ends meet which is why Feed Up, Warm Up has a foodbank service as part of the drop-in (as well as offering emergency supplies such as sleeping bags and toiletries and a barbering service).

Continue Reading

Good News

When Will Europe End Animal Testing?

Published

on

When Will Europe End Animal Testing
Nearly 500,000 animal procedures are still carried out each year in the EU for chemical safety compliance. | Photo: Dibbendu Koley.

Europe is aiming to end animal testing in chemical safety assessments. The European Commission’s newly adopted roadmap, published on 1 June 2026, sets out how the EU intends to shift away from long‑established animal experiments and replace them with modern, non‑animal scientific methods. The plan is not a vague political gesture: it is a structured programme covering 15 regulatory areas, from industrial chemicals and pesticides to pharmaceuticals and food additives. It responds directly to public pressure, including more than 1.2 million signatures gathered through the European Citizens’ Initiative “Save Cruelty‑Free Cosmetics”, and acknowledges that nearly 500,000 animal procedures are still carried out each year in the EU solely for chemical safety compliance.

The roadmap marks the first time the EU has committed to a coordinated, cross‑sector strategy to phase out animal testing in this field.

A Three‑Pillar Plan to Replace Animal Tests

The roadmap is built around three pillars designed to accelerate the shift towards non‑animal science while maintaining strict safety standards. The first pillar focuses on “making change happen”, offering more than 30 recommendations to replace, reduce or refine animal tests across human health and environmental assessments. These include expanding access to the Joint Research Centre’s facilities for developing alternatives and creating mechanisms to identify regulatory gaps where non‑animal methods can be introduced.

The second pillar aims to keep Europe at the forefront of scientific innovation. This includes supporting research networks, investing in artificial intelligence and data‑driven toxicology, and encouraging the development of internationally recognised standards for non‑animal approaches. The Commission argues that this shift is not only ethical but economically strategic, strengthening Europe’s competitiveness by adopting cutting‑edge technologies.

The third pillar focuses on collaboration within the EU and globally. Regulators, agencies, researchers and industry will work together to ensure consistent implementation, with progress monitored through indicators built into the roadmap. A high‑level conference in 2029 will assess how widely non‑animal methods have been adopted across EU legislation, including REACH.

Why Europe Is Moving Away from Animal Testing

The shift is driven by a combination of ethics, science and public demand. Across the EU, around 500,000 animal procedures are carried out each year for chemical safety assessments alone. These tests can involve force‑feeding chemicals to animals daily for months, causing pain, organ damage and death. A single reproductive toxicity test can use up to 2,500 animals for just one chemical.

At the same time, scientific alternatives have advanced rapidly. Modern in vitro systems, computational toxicology and AI‑supported modelling can often predict chemical effects more accurately than traditional animal tests. The Commission acknowledges that not all methods are ready to replace every test, but the roadmap is designed to accelerate validation and regulatory acceptance.

When can Europe Realistically End Animal Testing?

While the transition will take time, the EU Commission has already begun implementation. Experts expect the most visible reductions to occur between 2029 and the mid‑2030s, as new methods gain regulatory acceptance and older requirements are rewritten.

Based on the Commission’s timeline and expert analysis, the stages for the long anticipated transition will include:

  • 2026–2030: Early implementation, increased funding, validation of new methods, and initial reductions in animal use.
  • 2030–2035: Wider regulatory acceptance of non‑animal approaches across multiple sectors.
  • Beyond 2035: A realistic window for a near‑complete phase‑out, depending on scientific progress and legislative reform.

The EU Commission has already begun implementing the roadmap, signalling that the political commitment is in place. The 2029 review will be a key moment to assess whether the EU is on track.

Continue Reading

Trending